Serum-Stable and Selective Backbone-N-Methylated Cyclic Peptides That Inhibit Prokaryotic Glycolytic Mutases.

N-Methylated amino acids (N-MeAAs) are privileged residues of naturally occurring peptides critical to bioactivity. However, de novo discovery from ribosome display is limited by poor incorporation of N-methylated amino acids into the nascent peptide chain attributed to a poor EF-Tu affinity for the N-methyl-aminoacyl-tRNA. By reconfiguring the tRNA's T-stem region to compensate and tune the EF-Tu affinity, we conducted Random nonstandard Peptides Integrated Discovery (RaPID) display of a macrocyclic peptide (MCP) library containing six different N-MeAAs. We have here devised a "pool-and-split" enrichment strategy using the RaPID display and identified N-methylated MCPs against three species of prokaryotic metal-ion-dependent phosphoglycerate mutases. The enriched MCPs reached 57% N-methylation with up to three consecutively incorporated N-MeAAs, rivaling natural products. Potent nanomolar inhibitors ranging in ortholog selectivity, strongly mediated by N-methylation, were identified. Co-crystal structures reveal an architecturally related Ce-2 Ipglycermide active-site metal-ion-coordinating Cys lariat MCP, functionally dependent on two cis N-MeAAs with broadened iPGM species selectivity over the original nematode-selective MCPs. Furthermore, the isolation of a novel metal-ion-independent Staphylococcus aureus iPGM inhibitor utilizing a phosphoglycerate mimetic mechanism illustrates the diversity of possible chemotypes encoded by the N-MeAA MCP library.

Urine methanol concentration and alcohol hangover severity.

BACKGROUND: Congeners are substances, other than ethanol, that are produced during fermentation. Previous research found that the consumption of congener-rich drinks contributes to the severity of alcohol hangover. Methanol is such a congener that has been related to alcohol hangover. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the relationship between urine methanol concentration and alcohol hangover severity. METHODS: N = 36 healthy social drinkers (22 females, 14 males), aged 18-30 years old, participated in a naturalistic study, comprising a hangover day and a control day (no alcohol consumed the previous day). N = 18 of them had regular hangovers (the hangover group), while the other N = 18 claimed to be hangover-immune (hangover-immune group). Overall hangover severity was assessed, and that of 23 individual hangover symptoms. Urine methanol concentrations on the hangover and control days were compared, and correlated to hangover (symptom) severity. RESULTS: Urine methanol concentration was significantly higher on hangover days compared to control days (p = 0.0001). No significant differences in urine methanol concentration were found between the hangover group and hangover-immune group. However, urine methanol concentration did not significantly correlate with overall hangover severity (r = -0.011, p = 0.948), nor with any of the individual hangover symptoms. These findings were observed also when analyzing the data separately for the hangover-immune group. In the hangover group, a significant correlation with urine methanol concentration was found only with vomiting (r = 0.489, p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: No significant correlation was observed between urine methanol concentration and hangover severity, nor with individual core hangover symptoms.